|  |   | 
|  | |
|  | The Third, The Third of the Firsts | 
|  | |
|  | The Third of the Firsts is the Sign | 
|  | that encompasses The First Impression | 
|  | and the Image of Encounter (or First Effect). | 
|  | |
|  | That is how it goes. | 
|  | |
|  | Sign, Second Effect | 
|  | Repeat of The First Effect | 
|  | |
|  | -The image that arrived First, retreats into it. | 
|  | The image that arrived Second, peeks out of it - | 
|  | |
|  | The Binding Field that overlaps the Disturbed Field.   | 
|  | |
|  | And now there are three | 
|  | |
|  | Simultaneous sign of Image and Medium | 
|  | Not only does it move to and fro | 
|  | now image, then mediator | 
|  | but also, prompted by the First Impression, | 
|  | the Lively One | 
|  | oscillates | 
|  | between Image of Encounter -the realistic- | 
|  | and Initializing Image -the imaginatif, fantasizing - | 
|  | while interconnecting and contextualizing. |  | Repeatedly | 
|  | creating pattern and rule | 
|  | while its searchlight rotates | 
|  | It identifies and sketches | 
|  | retroactively | 
|  | with the finest profiles and the tiniest circumference | 
|  | the First of the Firsts and the Second of the Firsts. | 
|  | |
|  | Thus with Their Sign the entire First Group | 
|  | is positioned in front of the Scene | 
|  | and makes me feel my way into it. | 
|  | |
|  | That is how it lives in my heart. | 
|  | |
|  | And that is how it would have continued | 
|  | to and fro from fiction to fact | 
|  | from Initializing Image to Image of Encounter | 
|  | -and from Scene to Sign and from Sign to me- | 
|  | if a new Image had not emerged (Live!) | 
|  | whereto it transports | 
|  | all it stores (and itself) | 
|  | away from the reign of the heart | 
|  | to that of the mind. | 
|  | |
|  | |
|  |  |