|
|
|
|
The Third, the Third of the Seconds
|
|
|
The Third of the Seconds is The Sign.
|
|
It gathers and anchors
|
|
the Initializing Image (The First Impression)
|
|
and the Image of Encounter (The Real Impression or First Effect).
|
|
|
It also gathers and pulls around
|
|
The First, the Second and the Third of the Firsts
|
|
in a single Sign
|
|
All images -the total mass-
|
|
converge in that single Sign.
|
|
|
That is the rule.
|
|
|
Sign, Second Effect
|
|
Repeats the First Effect.
|
|
|
-The image that arrived First, retreats into it.
|
|
The image that arrived Second , peeks out of it -
|
|
|
The Binding Field that covers the Disturbed Field.
|
|
|
And now there are Three
|
|
|
The Sign is Image and Medium: |
|
Not only does it move to and fro
|
|
sometimes Image then Medium |
|
It also wobbles gently
|
|
between the Initializing Image
|
|
-the imaginative-
|
|
and the Image of Encounter -the objective-
|
|
and goes back as far as it can
|
|
to connect and contextualize between
|
|
emotion and mind
|
|
rude shock
|
|
gentle touch
|
|
process of the mind and feel of emotion.
|
|
|
It repeats itself, creating pattern and rule
|
|
while its search-light focuses
|
|
on the upper side
|
|
and retroactively
|
|
identifies and sketches
|
|
with its finest profiler and tiniest circumference.
|
|
the First of the Seconds and the Second of the Seconds
|
|
|
So the Seconds -through their Sign-
|
|
have stood in unison before the Firsts.
|
|
and enabled me to empathize with the scene
|
|
and grasp it with the mind .
|
|
|
And so would continue
|
|
its inner dialogue
|
|
of mere mind and emotion
|
|
if it were not interrupted
|
|
by a New Vivid Image (Live!)
|
|
whereto it transmits
|
|
all that it stores and remembers, including itself
|
|
and dares to diverge
|
|
from the Light Field to the Dark Field,
|
|
to the material area.
|
|
|
|